PIPQ (PVC Interface Priority Queuing) вас вряту?. Недавно робив таке для двох DLCI. По одному б?гав VoIP, по другому - дан?. В тво?му випадку я б ще в?дмаркував дан? на DLCI 1 (менш приор?тетний траф?к) по DE ? включив механ?зми BECN i FECN as BECN (relatively new feature). Ось приклад. Викинь непотр?бне (FRF.12, cRTP etc): ... ! frame-relay de-list 1 protocol ip list 100 ! interface Serial0/0 bandwidth 64 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no ip mroute-cache no keepalive clockrate 64000 frame-relay traffic-shaping frame-relay interface-queue priority frame-relay ip rtp header-compression ! interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point description PVC to FXS router for Voice bandwidth 48 ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 ip ospf network point-to-point no ip mroute-cache frame-relay interface-dlci 16 class fr-class-voip frame-relay ip rtp header-compression ! interface Serial0/0.2 point-to-point description PVC to FXS router for Data bandwidth 64 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip ospf network point-to-point no ip mroute-cache frame-relay de-group 1 100 frame-relay interface-dlci 17 class fr-class-data ! map-class frame-relay fr-class-voip frame-relay cir 48000 frame-relay bc 6000 frame-relay mincir 48000 no frame-relay adaptive-shaping frame-relay fair-queue frame-relay interface-queue priority high frame-relay fragment 80 ! map-class frame-relay fr-class-data frame-relay cir 64000 frame-relay bc 8000 frame-relay mincir 16000 frame-relay adaptive-shaping becn frame-relay fecn-adapt frame-relay interface-queue priority medium access-list 100 deny tcp any any eq 1720 access-list 100 deny udp any any range 16384 16484 access-list 100 permit ip any any ! ....
-----Original Message----- From: owner-uanog@uanog.kiev.ua [mailto:owner-uanog@uanog.kiev.ua]On Behalf Of Maxim Mazurok Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 2:41 PM To: uanog@uanog.kiev.ua Subject: [uanog] FR on cisco
в общем имею следующую схему:
------ ------ ------ |CISCO1| ---FR--- |CISCO2| ---FR--- |CISCO3| ------ ------ ------
между CISCO1 и CISCO2 канал 512K между CISCO2 и CISCO3 канал 128K
построены две PVC: CISCO1 <-> CISCO2 (dlci 1) CISCO1 <-> CISCO3 (dlci 2) dlci 2 пробрасывается CISCO2 по FR switching'у поверх обоих PVC бегает IP.
хочется, чтобы dlci 2 имел наибольший приоритет. но в случае, если dlci 2 не догружает свои 128K, то dlci 1 должна иметь право использовать всю свободную полосу между CISCO1 и CISCO2. что посоветуете?
-- Maxim Mazurok (MMP2-RIPE) =================================================================== uanog mailing list. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@uanog.kiev.ua with "unsubscribe uanog" in the body of the message
=================================================================== uanog mailing list. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@uanog.kiev.ua with "unsubscribe uanog" in the body of the message